Two Years of Home Sales Across Six Coachella Valley 55+ Communities
A study of 1,475 closed sales across six major active-adult communities reveals a market with more transactions, lower recent medians—and one notable exception in Del Webb Rancho Mirage.
Last Updated: July 28, 2026 | Time To Read: 10 minutes | Author: Mark Miller | Category: Real Estate
The market at a glance
The study includes 1,475 closed sale events totaling $884.8 million, with a median sale price of $560,000.
Closings increased from 704 to 771 in the most recent 12-month period, a gain of 9.5%, while the median sale price declined 7.1%.
The median home sold for $306 per square foot, measured 1,854 square feet and spent 56 days on market.
75.6% of sales closed below the final list price, yet the median closing still reached 98.1% of the last asking price.
Del Webb Rancho Mirage entered as the sample’s highest-priced community and had its lowest median MLS marketing time: a $825,000 median, $433 per square foot and 46 median days on market.
The latest year’s lower median was not only a change in community mix. After a basic community-and-size adjustment, the recent median remained about 5.4% below the earlier one.
55+ real estate in the Coachella Valley is often discussed as though it were one market. These transactions tell a different story.
The six communities in this study occupy a clear price ladder. Heritage Palms and Sun City Shadow Hills produced the lowest medians. Sun City Palm Desert formed the market’s largest and broadest middle. Trilogy La Quinta and the classified 55+ portion of Trilogy Polo Club occupied a premium tier. Del Webb Rancho Mirage stood above them all in median price and price per square foot.
At the same time, the latest 12 months were not simply a quieter version of the prior year. More homes sold, but the transaction mix shifted toward lower price bands, median price per square foot declined and a larger share of properties needed extended marketing time.
Scope of this study: The data covers Sun City Palm Desert, Sun City Shadow Hills, Del Webb Rancho Mirage, Trilogy La Quinta, Heritage Palms Country Club and a carefully classified 55+ sample within Trilogy Polo Club. It is not a complete census of every age-restricted sale in the Coachella Valley.
Table of contents
1,475 closed sales · July 29, 2024–July 27, 2026
Six-Community 55+ Sales Explorer
Move through the market shift, community medians, price distribution and relationship between marketing time and a final list price below the original.
Source: supplied MLS export and recalculated closed-sale metrics. This is a six-community study, not a census of every Coachella Valley 55+ transaction. Trilogy Polo Club figures represent a classified 55+ sample. The marketing-time view excludes two erroneous negative DOM values; original-list calculations exclude seven malformed values.
The big picture: more sales at lower recent prices
Across the complete two-year sample, the median sale price was $560,000. The middle half of transactions closed between $455,000 and $695,000, while the full range ran from $280,000 to $1.55 million.
The clearest comparison comes from dividing the data into two equal periods: July 28, 2024–July 27, 2025, and July 28, 2025–July 27, 2026.
| Metric | Full two years | Earlier 12 months | Most recent 12 months | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Closed sales | 1,475 | 704 | 771 | +9.5% |
| Closed-dollar volume | $884.8M | $435.0M | $449.8M | +3.4% |
| Median sale price | $560,000 | $581,450 | $540,000 | −7.1% |
| Median sold price per sq. ft. | $306 | $313 | $298 | −4.8% |
| Median days on market | 56 | 52 | 59 | +7 days |
| Median sale-to-final-list ratio | 98.1% | 98.2% | 98.1% | Nearly flat |
| Listings with a lower final list price | 41.9% | 40.7% | 43.0% | +2.3 points |
| Cash share of reported financing | 54.3% | 57.9% | 50.9% | −7.1 points |
The recent period produced 67 additional closings and $14.8 million more volume. Transaction count grew almost three times as quickly as dollar volume, which is consistent with more activity at lower price points rather than a broad expansion at the top.
It would be inaccurate to conclude that every 55+ home lost 7.1% of its value. A median compares the middle sale in two different groups of homes; it is not a repeat-sales appreciation index. Floor plan, living area, condition, lot, view, pool, upgrades and community mix all affect the result.
Still, the mix does not explain the entire decline. Reweighting the recent sales to match the earlier period across the six communities and four home-size bands raises the recent median from $540,000 to approximately $550,000. That adjusted figure remains 5.4% below the earlier $581,450 median.
The most defensible conclusion is simple: more homes closed in the latest year, but the typical transaction occurred at a lower total price, at a lower price per square foot and after a longer overall marketing period.
The price distribution shifted toward homes below $500,000
The price bands show where the extra transactions occurred.
| Sale price | Two-year sales | Two-year share | Earlier sales | Recent sales | Earlier share | Recent share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under $400,000 | 159 | 10.8% | 52 | 107 | 7.4% | 13.9% |
| $400,000–$499,999 | 356 | 24.1% | 156 | 200 | 22.2% | 25.9% |
| $500,000–$599,999 | 353 | 23.9% | 174 | 179 | 24.7% | 23.2% |
| $600,000–$749,999 | 337 | 22.8% | 180 | 157 | 25.6% | 20.4% |
| $750,000–$999,999 | 213 | 14.4% | 114 | 99 | 16.2% | 12.8% |
| $1 million or more | 57 | 3.9% | 28 | 29 | 4.0% | 3.8% |
Sub-$500,000 closings increased from 208 to 307—a 47.6% jump. Their share of the market rose from 29.5% to 39.8%.
Meanwhile, sales at $600,000 or more fell from 322 to 285 even though overall closings increased. Million-dollar transactions held almost level at 28 versus 29, but their percentage share edged lower.
Across the complete study:
34.9% sold below $500,000.
58.8% sold below $600,000.
81.7% sold below $750,000.
18.3% sold at $750,000 or more.
3.9% reached $1 million.
Adding Del Webb Rancho Mirage raises the full-sample price level, but it does not overturn the downward recent-period shift. In fact, Del Webb supplied much of the upper end: 101 of the study’s 270 sales at $750,000 or more, including 30 of the 57 million-dollar transactions.
How the six communities compared
The overall $560,000 median conceals a $352,500 difference between the lowest and highest community medians.
| Community | Closed sales | Share of study | Median sale | Middle 50% of sales | Median $/sq. ft. | Median DOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun City Palm Desert | 599 | 40.6% | $535,500 | $445,000–$630,000 | $295 | 52 |
| Sun City Shadow Hills | 385 | 26.1% | $500,000 | $420,000–$605,000 | $282 | 59 |
| Del Webb Rancho Mirage | 147 | 10.0% | $825,000 | $742,750–$952,500 | $433 | 46 |
| Trilogy La Quinta | 136 | 9.2% | $640,000 | $558,750–$829,250 | $347 | 56 |
| Heritage Palms Country Club | 104 | 7.1% | $472,500 | $419,272–$576,000 | $274 | 79.5 |
| Trilogy Polo Club, classified 55+ sample | 104 | 7.1% | $647,500 | $543,748–$800,000 | $361 | 62 |
Sun City Palm Desert remained the transaction engine
Sun City Palm Desert produced 599 closed sales—40.6% of the study—and $332.5 million in volume. Its $535,500 median placed it near the center of the six-community market, while its broad range included both the study’s $280,000 low and several seven-figure sales.
The recent median declined from $559,000 to $518,500, a 7.2% change, while median price per square foot slipped a more moderate 2.5%. Transaction count was almost level at 303 earlier versus 296 recently, and median marketing time moved only from 51 to 52 days.
That combination makes Sun City Palm Desert an important benchmark: the recent softening was not dependent on a sharp rise in its transaction count.
Sun City Shadow Hills paired higher volume with a lower recent median
Sun City Shadow Hills recorded 385 sales at a $500,000 median. Its final negotiations were comparatively firm: the median sale reached 98.4% of the final list price, and 30.6% sold at or above the last asking price—the highest share among the six samples.
Recent sales increased from 179 to 206, while the median declined from $535,000 to $486,500. Median living area also moved from 1,854 to 1,763 square feet, so a smaller-home mix explains part of the price change. It does not explain all of it: price per square foot declined 4.0%, and median marketing time rose from 53 to 61.5 days.
Del Webb Rancho Mirage was the premium outlier
Del Webb Rancho Mirage added 147 closed sales and $128.1 million in volume. It represented 10.0% of transactions but 14.5% of the study’s dollar volume.
Its position was distinct:
$825,000 median sale price, the highest of the six communities.
$433 median price per square foot, also the highest.
46 median days on market, the shortest.
$742,750–$952,500 middle-50% range.
A median year built of 2021, compared with 2004 for the study overall.
71.4% of its sold homes were built in 2020 or later.
Del Webb was also the only community whose recent median increased. Sales rose from 68 to 79; the median moved from $814,500 to $830,000; and median marketing time shortened from 51.5 to 39.5 days.
That does not prove broad appreciation. Median price per square foot slipped 0.8%, from about $436 to $432, and the share selling at or above the final list price fell from 32.4% to 15.2%. A different combination of floor plans, lots, pools and upgrades can lift the total-price median even when the per-square-foot figure eases.
The official launch announcement described a 1,026-home, gated community with 10 single-family detached plans, and PulteGroup reported that the community closed out in 2024. The transaction data now provide a useful look at how that newer housing stock is trading after builder closeout.
Trilogy La Quinta remained in the premium tier
Trilogy La Quinta produced a $640,000 median and a $347 median price per square foot. Its recent median changed from $645,000 to $621,500, a comparatively modest 3.6% decline.
The more revealing changes were beneath the headline price. Median price per square foot fell 9.0%, while median days on market increased from 49 to 66. Recent median living area was larger—1,939 square feet versus 1,835 earlier—which likely helped support total sale prices while the amount paid per square foot moved lower.
Heritage Palms showed the clearest buyer leverage
Heritage Palms had the lowest median sale price at $472,500 and the lowest median price per square foot at $274. Its negotiation profile was also the softest: median marketing time was 79.5 days, the median closing reached 96.8% of the final list price, 88.5% sold below the last asking price and 53.8% showed a lower final list price than original.
Recent sales increased from 41 to 63, but the median declined from $505,000 to $457,000. Median price per square foot fell 11.2%, and median marketing time increased from 66 to 86 days. The sample is smaller than the two Sun City communities, but the direction is consistent across several measures.
Trilogy Polo Club still requires a separate reading
Trilogy Polo Club contains age-qualified and all-age neighborhoods. MLS age flags and public marketing remarks did not agree on every listing. The structured senior-community flag was used as the starting point, then overridden only where the remarks explicitly placed the subject property in the opposite section. Generic language describing the development as mixed-age did not override the flag.
The resulting 104-sale sample had a $647,500 median and a $361 median price per square foot. Its median year built was approximately 2021, much newer than the established communities.
The recent median was $642,500 versus $654,465 earlier, a 1.8% decline. Median price per square foot declined 2.7%, and median marketing time increased from 59.5 to 68.5 days.
These figures are useful as a carefully classified market sample, but they should not be read as a legal inventory of every 55+ home inside Trilogy Polo Club.
Raw sales totals mostly reflect community size
Sun City Palm Desert recorded more than four times as many transactions as Del Webb Rancho Mirage, but it also contains roughly five times as many homes. Comparing known unique sold parcels with approximate community home counts produces a much tighter range.
| Community | Unique known parcels sold | Approx. community homes | Approx. two-year transaction footprint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sun City Palm Desert | 582 | About 5,000 | 11.6% |
| Sun City Shadow Hills | 378 | 3,450 | 11.0% |
| Del Webb Rancho Mirage | 140* | 1,026 | 13.6%* |
| Trilogy La Quinta | 132 | 1,238 | 10.7% |
| Heritage Palms Country Club | 103 | 1,004 | 10.3% |
*Del Webb note: Two closings lacked an APN. The table therefore uses 140 unique known parcels, although the true total could be as high as 142, producing an approximate footprint of 13.8%.
Across these five communities with usable home-count denominators, roughly 10% to 14% of the known homes appeared in a closed MLS transaction during the two-year window. Del Webb showed the highest approximate footprint.
*Two Del Webb closings lacked an APN. The table uses 140 unique known APNs, so its true property count could be as high as 142, or approximately 13.8% of the 1,026-home community.
This is an approximate MLS transaction footprint—not a formal turnover, mobility or residency rate. Community totals are current or rounded, MLS data omits off-market transfers and the denominator does not adjust for homes that were never available for sale. Trilogy Polo Club is excluded because its mixed-age structure makes the appropriate 55+ denominator uncertain.
The recorded sale-price gap was modest; the original-to-final list gap mattered more
These are gross sale-price comparisons. Seller concessions could not be measured reliably, so the figures do not capture the full negotiated economics or net seller proceeds.
Across all 1,475 transactions:
75.6% sold below the final list price.
24.4% sold at or above the final list price.
The median sale reached 98.1% of the final list price.
The median sale reached 96.5% of the valid original list price.
41.9% of listings with usable original-price data showed a lower final list price before closing.
Among those reduced listings, the median asking-price cut was $25,000, or approximately 4.6%.
The typical closing discount from the last asking price was only about 2%. That figure does not capture the larger adjustment that may already have occurred between the original and final list prices.
The reduction share increased from 40.7% in the earlier period to 43.0% recently. Reductions of at least 10% also became more common, rising from 4.1% to 7.4% of records with usable original prices.
Yet the final-list-to-sale ratio barely changed—98.2% earlier and 98.1% recently. For many listings, the larger asking-price adjustment appeared in the list-price history before the eventual sale.
The slow-moving tail expanded
The median marketing time increased seven days, but the slower end of the distribution changed more sharply.
The share closing within 30 days fell from 29.7% to 24.3%.
The share taking more than 90 days rose from 24.1% to 30.7%.
The share taking more than 120 days rose from 11.8% to 18.9%.
The 90th-percentile marketing time increased from 126 to 159 days.
Longer-market listings were much more likely to show a lower final list price than original.
| MLS days on market | Sales | Median sale/final list | Median sale/original list | Share with lower final list price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–30 days | 396 | 98.7% | 98.7% | 3.8% |
| 31–60 days | 396 | 98.2% | 97.4% | 25.3% |
| 61–120 days | 453 | 97.7% | 95.1% | 66.8% |
| 121+ days | 228 | 97.5% | 91.3% | 88.5% |
This is correlation, not proof that time caused a price reduction. A home may take longer because it began too high, needs renovation, has an unusual floor plan, occupies a less-preferred lot or entered the market during a slower window.
The pattern still carries a practical pricing lesson: the largest gap often appeared between the original asking price and the eventual market-clearing level—not between the final asking price and the closing price.
The table uses 1,473 sales with valid nonnegative MLS-reported days on market. Two erroneous negative values were excluded. The export did not include cumulative days on market.
Cash remained important, but the reported financing mix shifted
Financing type was reported for 1,109 of the 1,475 transactions. Of those reported records, 602 were marked cash, equal to 54.3%.
The reported cash share declined from 57.9% earlier to 50.9% recently. Cash therefore remained a major part of this 55+ sample, but financed buyers represented a larger portion of the latest reported closings.
Because financing was blank on 366 transactions—and on 93 of the 147 Del Webb sales—the percentages should always be presented as shares of transactions where financing was reported. The missing data are too extensive for a defensible community-level cash ranking.
The typical sale was a two-bedroom resale under 2,000 square feet
The median home measured 1,854 square feet and was built in 2004.
998 sales, or 67.7%, involved two-bedroom homes.
444 sales, or 30.1%, involved three-bedroom homes.
Two- and three-bedroom properties combined for 97.8% of all transactions.
869 homes, or 58.9%, measured less than 2,000 square feet.
164 homes, or 11.1%, were built in 2020 or later.
Del Webb materially increases the newer-home share, but the complete dataset remains primarily a resale study. A populated attached-property flag was available on 1,423 records, of which 117 were marked attached; attached-home flags should be interpreted cautiously because MLS entry practices can vary.
March through June produced the most closings—but two years is not a seasonal law
March through June accounted for 617 sales, or 41.8% of the study. The second quarter alone produced 451 closings, equal to 30.6%.
March recorded the most closings at 166, followed by April at 164. This supports a limited observation: spring produced the greatest closing volume during these two years. It does not establish a permanent seasonal rule. Two annual cycles are not enough to separate normal seasonality from interest rates, inventory changes, builder closeout activity or community-specific listing patterns.
What the numbers mean for buyers
The increase in completed sub-$500,000 sales gives buyers more recent evidence at the lower end of the market, especially in Heritage Palms, Sun City Shadow Hills and smaller plans within Sun City Palm Desert.
At the premium end, Del Webb Rancho Mirage requires its own comparison set. Its newer construction, substantially higher price per square foot and concentration of $750,000-plus sales make valleywide 55+ averages especially unhelpful there.
Negotiation room also depended on price history and time on market. A home fresh to market and correctly positioned behaved differently from one carrying several months of exposure and one or more price reductions.
Use community, floor plan, living area, lot position, renovation level and recent competing sales before using any broad median as an offer guide.
What the numbers mean for sellers
The latest year was not defined by fewer completed deals: 9.5% more transactions closed. The pattern suggests that reaching a market-clearing price was the central challenge for many listings.
The stable 98.1% final-list-to-sale ratio can create the impression that sellers gave up very little. In reality, more than four in ten usable records showed a lower final list price than original, and the 121-plus-day group closed at a median 91.3% of original list.
Pricing against the most comparable recent sales—not a six-community average or the highest neighboring asking price—became more important as the slow-moving tail expanded. Del Webb’s recent performance is encouraging, but even there, a higher median total price coincided with a slightly lower price per square foot and fewer sales at or above the final ask.
The clearest conclusion
The six-community 55+ market became more active in transaction count but softer in its typical recent closing profile.
More homes changed hands. The median price and median price per square foot moved lower. Marketing time increased, and lower price bands captured a larger share of the market. At the same time, the final negotiation gap remained modest while the share with a lower final list price rose from 40.7% to 43.0%, and reductions of at least 10% rose from 4.1% to 7.4%.
Del Webb Rancho Mirage is the important exception. It had the highest median price, highest median price per square foot and lowest median MLS days on market in the two-year data. Its recent median increased and its marketing time shortened. Those results add nuance—but not a reversal—to the broader market story.
The data reject the idea of a single Coachella Valley 55+ price point. Heritage Palms, the two Sun City communities, Del Webb Rancho Mirage and the two Trilogy samples serve materially different budgets, product preferences and housing eras. The most useful question is not simply what a 55+ home costs, but which community, floor plan, lot and lifestyle structure are being compared.
Explore the complete 55+ communities in the Coachella Valley guide to compare locations, home types, HOA structures, golf and amenities beyond the transaction data.
Frequently asked questions
What was the median 55+ home sale price in this study?
The median was $560,000 across 1,475 classified closed sales in the July 28, 2024–July 27, 2026 data window. The middle 50% of transactions closed between $455,000 and $695,000.
Which community had the lowest median sale price?
Heritage Palms had the lowest two-year median at $472,500, followed by Sun City Shadow Hills at $500,000. Community medians reflect different home sizes, ages, lot types, locations and condition mixes.
Which community had the highest median sale price?
Del Webb Rancho Mirage had the highest median at $825,000 and the highest median price per square foot at $433. Trilogy Polo Club’s classified 55+ sample followed at a $647,500 median, and Trilogy La Quinta recorded $640,000.
Does the 7.1% lower recent median mean every home lost 7.1% of its value?
No. The comparison measures the middle sale in two different groups of transactions. A shift in community, home size, floor plan, lot, condition or upgrades changes the median. Even after a basic community-and-size adjustment, the recent median remained approximately 5.4% below the earlier median, but this is still not a repeat-sales appreciation index.
Is every home in Trilogy Polo Club age-restricted?
No. Trilogy Polo Club contains both age-qualified and all-age neighborhoods. Its figures use the structured MLS senior-community flag as the starting point, with narrow overrides where public remarks explicitly placed the subject property in the opposite section. The resulting figures are a classified transaction sample, not a legal determination for every property.
Sources and methodology
The primary source was an MLS export generated July 28, 2026. It contained 1,763 records: 1,501 closed, 234 active and 28 pending. The new export preserved the prior records and added 166 Del Webb Rancho Mirage records, including 147 closed sales. Only closed sales with a valid date, positive closed price and living area were used.
Five fully age-qualified communities were included despite occasional incorrect MLS senior-community flags. All 147 Del Webb Rancho Mirage closings were included because the subdivision is age-qualified; 16 of those records were marked “N” in the MLS senior-community field, and several public remarks explicitly described the properties as 55+ or active-adult homes.
Trilogy Polo Club was classified separately. Its structured senior-community flag was the default; four senior-marked records were excluded because their public remarks explicitly placed the subject property in the all-age section, and four non-senior records were restored because their remarks explicitly placed the subject property in the 55+ section. The final Trilogy Polo Club sample contains 104 of 130 raw closed records.
The final study cohort contains 1,475 sale events. An APN was populated for 1,472, representing 1,437 unique known parcels. Thirty-five known parcels recorded two legitimate closings during the period; three sales lacked an APN. The study therefore counts transactions, not only unique homes.
Sold price per square foot and list-price ratios were recalculated from underlying prices and square footage. The mix-adjusted comparison reweighted the recent period to the earlier period’s distribution across six community samples and four living-area bands: under 1,500, 1,500–1,999, 2,000–2,499 and 2,500 or more square feet.
Seven malformed original list prices were removed from original-price calculations. Two negative days-on-market values were removed from marketing-time calculations. Seller-concession data were not used for a market conclusion because 822 study records were blank and populated entries mixed percentages, dollars and at least one impossible value.
The study reflects MLS-recorded transactions in the six represented communities. It may not include private, off-market or every builder sale, and MLS records can be revised.
Community status and approximate home-count context were checked against the Sun City Palm Desert Community Association, Sun City Shadow Hills Community Association, Heritage Palms, Trilogy La Quinta, Trilogy Polo Club and FirstService Residential’s Trilogy La Quinta case study.
Del Webb Rancho Mirage status and scale were checked against PulteGroup’s 2018 grand-opening announcement, PulteGroup’s 2025 statement that the community closed out in 2024, the Del Webb Rancho Mirage community association and Del Webb’s age-qualification notice.