Del Webb Rancho Mirage: Home Prices & Market Trends
Sales accelerated, but a shift toward larger homes—not uniform appreciation—drove the higher median price.
Last Updated: August 11, 2026 | Time to Read: 25 minutes | Author: Mark Miller | Category: 55+
Del Webb at Rancho Mirage—the community’s official name—is a relatively young resale market with a narrow range of construction years but a wide range of home sizes, floor plans, lots, pools, views, solar arrangements, and outdoor improvements. A 2019 City of Rancho Mirage Community Facilities District official statement identifies 1,029 age-qualified detached homes at completion. PulteGroup’s 2018 grand-opening announcement describes a gated 55+ community of fee-simple detached homes with ten original plans from 1,438 to 2,726 square feet. The MLS history now spans homes built from 2018 through 2024 and recorded living areas up to 2,787 square feet, reflecting expansions or public-record differences.
That product range is essential to understanding the latest market numbers.
From August 6, 2025 through August 5, 2026, 79 MLS-reported sales closed, up 14.5% from 69 during the preceding 12 months. The median closed price increased 3.7%, from $810,000 to $840,000, and closed dollar volume increased 18.0%.
Those headline gains do not mean every home appreciated 3.7%. The median sold home became 176 square feet larger—an increase of 9.6%—while median sold price per square foot slipped 0.8%, from $436.41 to $432.80. The share of closings at 2,000 square feet or more rose from 36.2% to 50.6%.
The most accurate summary is stronger sales activity with an almost flat price-per-square-foot result and a meaningful shift toward larger homes. Homes sold faster, but buyers were less likely to pay the final asking price. Current supply was moderate overall, yet the available inventory was concentrated in smaller and lower-priced homes rather than distributed evenly across the community.
Sales activity strengthened: 79 closings in the latest 12 months versus 69 in the prior period, a 14.5% increase; closed volume rose 18.0% to $70.23 million.
The median price rose, but the product mix changed: the median closed price increased 3.7% to $840,000 while median sold price per square foot declined 0.8% and median sold size increased 9.6%.
Homes sold faster without producing more full-price outcomes: median MLS-reported days on market fell from 52 to 39.5, but the share closing at or above the final list price fell from 31.9% to 15.2%. No latest-period sale exceeded final list price.
Current supply was highly segmented: the August 11 export contained 20 active-status listings, two separately marked contingent. That equaled about 3.04 months at the trailing sales pace, or 2.73 months after excluding the two contingent-flagged records.
Smaller homes offered more selection: estimated inventory was 9.0 months below 1,600 square feet but only 0.8 month from 2,000 through 2,399 square feet.
How to read this study
Six guardrails matter. Community-wide medians compare different homes rather than following one identical property. Builder and resale transactions are not interchangeable. Active asking prices represent seller expectations—not known future closing prices. MLS days on market may not capture exposure under prior listing numbers. Feature categories overlap and depend on agent-entered fields. Private, off-market, deed-only, canceled, expired, withdrawn, and differently labeled transactions may be absent.
The $840,000 community median answers a narrow question: what was the middle closed price among the 79 sales in the latest rolling year? It does not establish the value of a particular Getaway, Solitude, Expedition, Sanctuary, Haven, Preserve, Refuge, Serenity, Journey, or Voyage after accounting for exact configuration, pool, yard improvements, lot size, view, orientation, solar obligation, garage format, condition, furnishings, and seller motivation.
Table of contents
Market Explorer
Del Webb Rancho Mirage: Market Explorer
Explore the latest equal-period market comparison, then switch to annual history to see how prices, pace, and sales activity have moved since 2019.
MLS research prepared August 11, 2026; closed sales included through August 5, 2026.
+14.5% vs. prior period
+3.7% vs. prior period
−0.8% vs. prior period
−12.5 days vs. prior period
Equal-period comparison
Median sold price
Two non-overlapping 12-month periods make the comparison seasonally balanced.
View the underlying data tables
Swipe horizontally to see all table columns.
Latest equal-period comparison
| Measure | Latest Aug. 6, 2025–Aug. 5, 2026 |
Prior Aug. 6, 2024–Aug. 5, 2025 |
Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closings | 79 | 69 | +14.5% |
| Closed volume | $70,229,527 | $59,520,949 | +18.0% |
| Median sold price | $840,000 | $810,000 | +3.7% |
| Mean sold price | $888,981 | $862,622 | +3.1% |
| Median sold $/sf | $432.80 | $436.41 | −0.8% |
| Median home size | 2,008 sf | 1,832 sf | +9.6% |
| Median DOM | 39.5 days* | 52.0 days | −12.5 days (−24.0%) |
| Median sale/final list | 98.49% | 98.78% | −0.29 points |
| Sold at/above final list | 12 / 15.2% | 22 / 31.9% | −16.7 points |
| Reduced before close | 30 / 38.0% | 28 / 40.6% | −2.6 points |
| Median cut among reduced | $28,000 / 2.97% | $49,000 / 4.65% | Smaller cut |
Annual history
| Year | Closings | Median price | Median $/sf | Median DOM | Sale/final list | Builder-labeled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 25 | $540,000 | $260.82 | 58.0 | 99.87% | 24 |
| 2020 | 25 | $569,000 | $267.53 | 74.0 | 99.40% | 11 |
| 2021 | 45 | $700,000 | $362.07 | 37.0 | 99.52% | 5 |
| 2022 | 37 | $850,000 | $462.33 | 42.0 | 100.00% | 4 |
| 2023 | 79 | $879,000 | $421.48 | 49.0 | 98.11% | 32 |
| 2024 | 78 | $859,500 | $448.56 | 53.0 | 98.88% | 3 |
| 2025 | 65 | $780,000 | $424.87 | 49.0 | 98.49% | 0 |
| 2026 YTD* | 49 | $850,000 | $442.25 | 37.5 | 98.69% | 0 |
*2026 is year to date through August 5 and should not be treated as a complete calendar year. Prices are nominal. DOM means days on market. The latest-period median DOM uses 78 valid records after one invalid negative value was excluded. “Builder-labeled” is a conservative MLS classification: New Construction is Y, structured condition says New Construction, or the listing agency name contains Pulte. The last identified builder-labeled closing was September 27, 2024.
Latest 12 months versus the prior 12 months
The primary analysis uses two equal, contiguous, non-overlapping periods ending with the latest closed sale in the export:
Latest 12 months: August 6, 2025–August 5, 2026
Prior 12 months: August 6, 2024–August 5, 2025
Closed sales are analyzed separately from active-status inventory.
Swipe or drag horizontally to view the full comparison.
| Market indicator | Prior 12 months | Latest 12 months | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MLS-reported closings | 69 | 79 | +10 / +14.5% |
| Closed dollar volume | $59,520,949 | $70,229,527 | +$10,708,578 / +18.0% |
| Median closed price | $810,000 | $840,000 | +$30,000 / +3.7% |
| Average closed price | $862,622 | $888,981 | +3.1% |
| Closed-price range | $620,000–$1,385,000 | $578,750–$1,360,000 | Descriptive |
| Median recalculated sold price / sq. ft. | $436.41 | $432.80 | −$3.61 / −0.8% |
| Median reported living area | 1,832 sq. ft. | 2,008 sq. ft. | +176 sq. ft. / +9.6% |
| Median MLS-reported DOM | 52 days | 39.5 days* | −12.5 days / −24.0% |
| Median sale / final-list ratio | 98.78% | 98.49% | −0.29 percentage point |
| Sold at or above final list | 22 / 31.9% | 12 / 15.2% | −16.7 percentage points |
| Sold above final list | 3 | 0 | −3 |
| Reduced before closing | 28 / 40.6% | 30 / 38.0% | −2.6 percentage points |
| Median cut among reduced listings | $49,000 / 4.65% | $28,000 / 2.97% | Smaller cut |
| Median sale / original-list ratio | 97.62% | 96.85% | −0.77 percentage point |
*The latest-period DOM median falls between two whole-number observations, producing a calculated median of 39.5 days.
*The latest median DOM uses 78 valid observations because one closing carried an invalid negative value.
The market completed more sales and did so more quickly. The latest year averaged 6.58 closings per month, and the median successful listing took 12.5 fewer reported days to sell.
Pricing requires more care. A $30,000 increase in the median closed price appears bullish by itself, but the middle sold home was materially larger. The price-per-square-foot median was nearly flat and slightly lower. These are not contradictory results: a market can sell a larger mix of homes at higher total prices without establishing the same appreciation rate for every plan.
The negotiation figures add another layer. Price reductions became slightly less common and substantially smaller, but the MLS does not establish when those reductions occurred or prove that sellers began closer to market value. The typical buyer still closed 1.51% below the final asking price, and the share paying at least final list price was cut by more than half.
Faster successful sales therefore did not translate into more above-list outcomes. Homes moved more quickly, while buyers retained more final-list negotiating leverage than the DOM improvement alone might imply.
What Del Webb Rancho Mirage homes actually sold for
The latest 12-month range extended from $578,750 to $1.36 million. Those endpoints show the breadth of the market, but the distribution between them is more useful.
Swipe or drag horizontally to view the full comparison.
| Closed-price band | Prior sales | Prior share | Latest sales | Latest share | Count change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under $700,000 | 9 | 13.0% | 11 | 13.9% | +2 |
| $700,000–$799,999 | 24 | 34.8% | 22 | 27.8% | −2 |
| $800,000–$899,999 | 16 | 23.2% | 14 | 17.7% | −2 |
| $900,000–$1,099,999 | 10 | 14.5% | 21 | 26.6% | +11 |
| $1.1 million or more | 10 | 14.5% | 11 | 13.9% | +1 |
The most important change occurred from $900,000 through $1,099,999. That band more than doubled from 10 to 21 closings and accounted for over one-quarter of the latest market.
In total, 32 of 79 latest sales—40.5%—closed for at least $900,000, compared with 20 of 69—29.0%—in the prior period. At the same time, the share below $700,000 remained almost unchanged. The market did not simply shift upward at every level; it produced many more upper-middle transactions while continuing to close a smaller-home entry segment.
This distribution is consistent with the change in home size. The latest year contained 30 closings from 2,000 through 2,399 square feet, up from 13, while the number from 1,600 through 1,999 square feet fell from 37 to 31.
The $840,000 median should therefore be treated as a center point for the collection of homes that sold—not a price estimate for the home under consideration.
Compare the larger 55+ market: Explore the Coachella Valley 55+ resource hub, the six-community 55+ comparison, or the two-year sales study across major Coachella Valley 55+ communities.
Why the higher median does not equal uniform appreciation
The clearest evidence comes from the relationship between total price, price per square foot, and the size of homes that sold:
The median closed price increased 3.7%.
The median sold price per square foot declined 0.8%.
The median sold home became 9.6% larger.
The share of sales at 2,000 square feet or more increased from 36.2% to 50.6%.
If values had moved uniformly upward by 3.7%, stronger results would normally be expected across comparable size groups. The segmented results were more complicated.
Performance by home size
Swipe or drag horizontally to view the full comparison.
| Reported living area | Latest sales | Latest median price | Latest median $ / sq. ft. | Latest median DOM | Prior sales | Prior median price | Prior median $ / sq. ft. | Prior median DOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 1,600 sq. ft. | 8 | $645,189 | $446.64 | 18.5 days | 7 | $634,990 | $441.58 | 69 days |
| 1,600–1,999 sq. ft. | 31 | $745,500 | $428.49 | 32 days | 37 | $789,000 | $441.76 | 52 days |
| 2,000–2,399 sq. ft. | 30 | $937,500 | $427.34 | 63 days | 13 | $860,000 | $401.92 | 50 days |
| 2,400 sq. ft. or more | 10 | $1,218,750 | $460.17 | 27.5 days | 12 | $1,150,000 | $434.75 | 43.5 days |
The size tiers moved in different directions:
Under 1,600 square feet: median price increased 1.6%, and median sold price per square foot increased 1.1%.
1,600–1,999 square feet: median price declined 5.5%, and median sold price per square foot declined 3.0%.
2,000–2,399 square feet: median price increased 9.0%, and median sold price per square foot increased 6.3%.
2,400 square feet or more: median price increased 6.0%, and median sold price per square foot increased 5.8%.
The 1,600–1,999-square-foot tier weakened even while the community-wide median increased. The two larger tiers strengthened, and the 2,000–2,399-square-foot group more than doubled its closing count. This is why the headline median cannot stand alone.
Smaller homes also produced a higher price per square foot than some larger categories. That is not unusual. Kitchens, bathrooms, garages, lots, landscaping, and other high-cost components are spread across fewer square feet, while plan efficiency and outdoor improvements can matter more than raw living area.
The 2026 year-to-date rebound
January 1 through August 5 offers a same-date check:
Swipe or drag horizontally to view the full comparison.
| Market indicator | 2025 YTD | 2026 YTD | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closings | 35 | 49 | +40.0% |
| Closed dollar volume | $28,509,400 | $44,655,900 | +56.6% |
| Median closed price | $780,000 | $850,000 | +9.0% |
| Median sold price / sq. ft. | $423.67 | $442.25 | +4.4% |
| Median MLS-reported DOM | 57 days | 37.5 days | −34.2% |
| Sold at or above final list | 25.7% | 18.4% | −7.3 percentage points |
The 2026 figures support a rebound from a weaker 2025. They have not fully exceeded the same-date 2024 level. From January 1 through August 5, 2024, the median was $882,000 and median sold price per square foot was $450.55. The 2026 year-to-date result was 3.6% lower on total price and 1.8% lower on price per square foot.
The strongest conclusion is therefore not that Del Webb Rancho Mirage entered a new straight-line surge. Activity and pricing improved from 2025, while the longer comparison still shows a market below some 2024 measures and divided by home size.
Where buyers found negotiating room
The latest market moved faster, but final-price leverage weakened for sellers.
Median sale-to-final-list ratio: 98.49%
Median discount from final list: 1.51%
Closed at or above final list: 12 sales / 15.2%
Closed above final list: zero
Reduced before closing: 30 sales / 38.0%
Median reduction among reduced listings: $28,000 / 2.97%
Median sale-to-original-list ratio: 96.85%
The difference between original and final list price matters. A home can close close to the final ask only after the seller has already adjusted from an unsuccessful opening position. In the latest period, 38.0% of closings had reduced before sale.
Reductions became slightly less common than in the prior year, and the typical cut became smaller—from $49,000 and 4.65% to $28,000 and 2.97%. The export does not show reduction timing consistently enough to conclude that sellers began closer to the market.
However, the median sale-to-original-list ratio moved lower, from 97.62% to 96.85%, and the share closing at or above the final list price fell sharply. The evidence points to a market that rewarded accurate pricing and still gave buyers room to negotiate when a home was not a rare, correctly priced match.
Listing history is more informative than one ratio. Original ask, reductions, prior listing numbers, cumulative exposure, current competing inventory, private-pool alternatives, solar obligations, condition, furnishings, and the closest plan-matched closings all help explain the final outcome.
Current active inventory
Snapshot date: August 11, 2026
The export contained 20 listings coded active. Two of those also carried a separate contingent flag, so the practical freely available count may be closer to 18 depending on live status. The export contained no separate pending-status record.
| Current-snapshot measure | August 11, 2026 |
|---|---|
| Active-status listings | 20 |
| Separately contingent-flagged within active status | 2 |
| Asking-price range | $600,000–$1,299,000 |
| Median asking price | $739,000 |
| Total asking volume | $16,293,210 |
| Median asking price / sq. ft. | $421.73 |
| Median reported living area | 1,801 sq. ft. |
| Size range | 1,438–2,726 sq. ft. |
| Median MLS-reported DOM | 71.5 days |
| DOM range | 1–131 days |
| Reduced listings | 9 / 45.0% |
| Median cut among reduced listings | $21,000 / 3.21% |
| Listings with at least 91 DOM | 7 / 35.0% |
| Explicit private-pool marker | 7 / 35.0% |
| Builder-labeled active records | 0 |
| Trailing closing pace | 6.58 per month |
| Months of inventory using all 20 | 3.04 months |
| Months of inventory excluding two contingent-flagged records | 2.73 months |
The current market contains a visible aged-inventory tail:
| Active DOM band | Listings | Share of active inventory |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 days | 7 | 35% |
| 31–60 days | 2 | 10% |
| 61–90 days | 4 | 20% |
| 91 days or more | 7 | 35% |
All seven listings at 91 or more reported days on market had already reduced their asking price. That does not mean each is overvalued by the same amount. Lot, model, pool, solar structure, furnishings, condition, and seasonal exposure can all affect time. It does show that accumulated market time and reductions were concentrated in the same group.
Why the active median ask is below the recent sold median
The active median asking price was $739,000, 12.0% below the latest rolling median sale price of $840,000. That gap is not a forecast that community values are about to fall 12%.
The two groups contain different homes:
The active median size was 1,801 square feet, compared with 2,008 square feet among latest-period closings.
Sixteen of 20 active-status listings—80%—were under 2,000 square feet.
Fourteen of 20—70%—were priced below $800,000.
Only 39 of 79 latest-period closings—49.4%—were under 2,000 square feet.
The lower active median primarily reflects a smaller-home inventory mix. Active asking prices also remain untested until the homes close.
Why supply depends on price and home size
The community-wide inventory ratio hides the largest practical difference in the current market.
Inventory by asking-price band
Swipe or drag horizontally to view the full comparison.
| Price band | Active-status listings | Latest 12-month closings | Estimated months of inventory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $700,000 | 7 | 11 | 7.64 months |
| $700,000–$799,999 | 7 | 22 | 3.82 months |
| $800,000–$899,999 | 1 | 14 | 0.86 month |
| $900,000–$1,099,999 | 3 | 21 | 1.71 months |
| $1.1 million or more | 2 | 11 | 2.18 months |
The under-$700,000 tier contained the greatest supply relative to its trailing sales pace. The $800,000–$899,999 tier appeared tightest, although one active listing makes that estimate highly sensitive to a single new listing, status change, or closing.
Inventory by reported living area
Swipe or drag horizontally to view the full comparison.
| Size band | Active-status listings | Latest 12-month closings | Estimated months of inventory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 1,600 sq. ft. | 6 | 8 | 9.00 months |
| 1,600–1,999 sq. ft. | 10 | 31 | 3.87 months |
| 2,000–2,399 sq. ft. | 2 | 30 | 0.80 month |
| 2,400 sq. ft. or more | 2 | 10 | 2.40 months |
This is one of the most actionable findings in the study.
Buyers seeking a compact Getaway or another home below 1,600 square feet had more selection relative to the recent sales pace. Buyers focused on the 2,000–2,399-square-foot range faced a much narrower snapshot, with only two active-status listings against 30 closings during the preceding year.
The ratio does not establish that every smaller home is negotiable or every larger home will sell quickly. A highly upgraded private-pool Getaway on a superior lot may face a much smaller comparison set than the six-listing size-band count implies. Conversely, an aspirationally priced larger home can still accumulate market time.
These estimates combine a one-day inventory count with a trailing annual closing pace. They are current-market indicators—not seasonally adjusted forecasts.
How pools, views, and lot settings divide the market
Del Webb Rancho Mirage contains overlapping property-level submarkets. The MLS fields are incomplete, so a record without an explicit feature marker should be treated as not identified, not as proof that the feature is absent.
The latest 24-month cohort covers 148 closings from August 6, 2024 through August 5, 2026.
Swipe or drag horizontally to view the full comparison.
| Explicit MLS feature cohort | Flagged sales | Flagged median price | Flagged median $ / sq. ft. | Flagged median size | Not-flagged sales | Not-flagged median price | Not-flagged median $ / sq. ft. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Private pool | 60 | $940,000 | $472.75 | 1,858 sq. ft. | 88 | $784,500 | $416.80 |
| Mountain view | 129 | $835,000 | $440.11 | 1,858 sq. ft. | 19 | $789,000 | $408.53 |
| Panoramic view | 32 | $947,500 | $467.08 | 2,111 sq. ft. | 116 | $796,000 | $429.15 |
| Greenbelt or park setting | 19 | $900,000 | $463.97 | 2,008 sq. ft. | 129 | $819,000 | $431.15 |
| Premium-lot marker | 23 | $865,000 | $452.51 | 1,858 sq. ft. | 125 | $819,000 | $432.80 |
| Updated or remodeled marker | 22 | $865,000 | $449.72 | 1,845 sq. ft. | 126 | $824,500 | $433.72 |
The private-pool comparison is the cleanest broad feature cohort because the two groups had almost identical median living areas: 1,858 versus 1,855 square feet. Private-pool-marked homes recorded a $940,000 median closed price and $472.75 median sold price per square foot, compared with $784,500 and $416.80 among homes without the explicit marker.
That difference is meaningful, but it is not a pure pool premium. The private-pool group also had a larger median lot—7,591 versus 6,970 square feet—and can differ in landscaping, outdoor kitchens, spas, shade structures, orientation, views, solar, furnishings, and overall upgrade level.
A model-controlled directional check found higher median sold price per square foot for the private-pool group across all ten named model groups. The median within-model difference was approximately $61.39 per square foot, or 14.7%. Even that narrower comparison does not isolate pool age, quality, lot, view, landscaping, interior condition, or sale date.
The golf-cart-garage cohort demonstrates why raw feature medians can mislead. Its latest 24-month median price was $1.12 million, but its median home measured 2,509 square feet—roughly 665 square feet larger than the comparison group. That result says more about which floor plans commonly carry the feature than about the standalone value of a garage bay.
The practical conclusion is specific: a private-pool home should begin with private-pool comparisons when enough recent matches exist. A panoramic-view, greenbelt, or premium-lot property should be evaluated against similar settings. No feature table should be converted into an automatic appraisal adjustment.
Swipe or drag horizontally to view the full comparison.
| Model | Common recorded size | Latest 24-month sales | Median closed price | Median sold $ / sq. ft. | Active-status listings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Getaway | 1,438 sq. ft. | 10 | $636,995 | $442.97 | 5 |
| Solitude | 1,657 sq. ft. | 13 | $732,000 | $441.76 | 1 |
| Expedition | 1,770 sq. ft. | 16 | $745,000 | $420.90 | 3 |
| Sanctuary | 1,832 sq. ft. | 21 | $799,500 | $436.41 | 5 |
| Haven | 1,858 sq. ft. | 11 | $875,000 | $470.94 | 0 |
| Preserve | 2,008 sq. ft. | 12 | $835,000 | $415.84 | 0 |
| Refuge | 2,187 sq. ft. | 11 | $880,000 | $401.92 | 0 |
| Serenity | 2,329 sq. ft. | 7 | $1,050,000 | $444.16 | 1 |
| Journey | 2,504 sq. ft. | 13 | $1,200,000 | $479.23 | 0 |
| Voyage | 2,726 sq. ft. | 6 | $1,215,000 | $445.71 | 1 |
Four active-status listings were not classified into the table. The active plan mix reinforces the broader inventory story: Getaway, Sanctuary, and Expedition accounted for 13 of the 16 plan-classified active listings, while Preserve, Refuge, and Journey had none.
Model medians remain descriptive. A Haven with a private pool, panoramic mountain view, mature landscaping, paid solar, and extensive upgrades may not compete directly with another Haven lacking those features. Some homes also contain builder options, room conversions, or recorded square-footage differences.
The model name is the beginning of the comparison—not the end. A stronger valuation sequence is:
Confirm the original plan, structural options, permitted alterations, and actual room configuration.
Compare recent sales of the same model or the closest functional substitute.
Separate private pool, lot, view, orientation, greenbelt, and clubhouse-location differences.
Review solar ownership or payment obligations, outdoor improvements, furnishings, and condition.
Use broader size-band and community data only after the closest property matches have been studied.
The builder-to-resale transition and longer market history
The MLS history begins with builder-dominated sales and ends as a resale market. A builder-labeled record is one marked new construction, carrying a structured new-construction condition, or listed by a brokerage name containing Pulte.
The last builder-labeled closing in the export occurred September 27, 2024. None of the 20 current active-status records met the builder-labeled rule. The association’s September 2024 Roadrunner newsletter also discussed Pulte’s departure and the transfer of full maintenance responsibility to the association. Together, those sources support describing the community as a resale market, but they should not be treated as proof that no direct builder or developer opportunity can exist without separate confirmation.
This transition matters because builder closings and resales can reflect different incentives, upgrades, lot releases, construction timing, and MLS-entry practices.
The full export contains 408 closed sales from September 28, 2018 through August 5, 2026, totaling $332.89 million. The full-history median was $794,000, but that number blends early builder sales, pandemic-era appreciation, later builder releases, and current resales.
The 2018 and 2026 calendar-year rows are partial.
Swipe or drag horizontally to view the full comparison.
| Calendar year | Closings | Builder-labeled closings | Median closed price | Median sold $ / sq. ft. | Median size | Median DOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 partial | 5 | 5 | $511,990 | $261.45 | 2,008 sq. ft. | 55 days |
| 2019 | 25 | 24 | $540,000 | $260.82 | 2,008 sq. ft. | 58 days |
| 2020 | 25 | 11 | $569,000 | $267.53 | 1,885 sq. ft. | 74 days |
| 2021 | 45 | 5 | $700,000 | $362.07 | 1,883 sq. ft. | 37 days |
| 2022 | 37 | 4 | $850,000 | $462.33 | 1,858 sq. ft. | 42 days |
| 2023 | 79 | 32 | $879,000 | $421.48 | 1,883 sq. ft. | 49 days |
| 2024 | 78 | 3 | $859,500 | $448.56 | 1,858 sq. ft. | 53 days |
| 2025 | 65 | 0 | $780,000 | $424.87 | 1,858 sq. ft. | 49 days |
| 2026 through Aug. 5 | 49 | 0 | $850,000 | $442.25 | 1,858 sq. ft. | 37.5 days |
The annual series shows rapid appreciation into 2022, a higher total-price median in 2023 alongside lower price per square foot, moderation through 2025, and a partial 2026 rebound. It should not be read as a same-home index.
The 2023 result is a good example. That year produced the highest calendar median at $879,000, but 32 of 79 closings were builder-labeled, and median price per square foot was below both 2022 and 2024. Lot releases, plan mix, upgrades, and builder reporting can change the annual median independently of uniform resale appreciation.
What same-property resales add
A stricter repeat-sale analysis matched consecutive transactions at the same normalized address, required at least a 180-day holding period, kept square footage within 2%, and required unchanged recorded bedroom and bathroom counts.
Swipe or drag horizontally to view the full comparison.
| Repeat-sale measure | All strict pairs | Later sale in latest rolling year | Later sale in prior rolling year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matched pairs | 49 | 15 | 9 |
| Median holding period | 2.09 years | Not separately reported | Not separately reported |
| Median total nominal price change | +12.50% | +4.62% | +6.57% |
| Median annualized nominal change | +6.97% | +3.04% | +6.97% |
| Higher / lower / approximately flat | 35 / 13 / 1 | 9 / 5 / 1 | 6 / 3 / 0 |
Same-property resales remained positive at the median, but the latest strict cohort appreciated more slowly than the prior cohort. That result is directional rather than a formal index. The MLS does not control for pool installation, landscaping, solar payoff or transfer, remodeling, furnishings, deferred maintenance, transaction costs, or seller motivation between the two sales.
The latest subset is also small. Fifteen pairs cannot define the appreciation rate for every home in a community with ten plans and many lot and improvement combinations.
What this report deliberately does not claim
That every Del Webb Rancho Mirage home appreciated 3.7%
The median of one 79-sale group was 3.7% above the median of a different 69-sale group. The latest median home was 9.6% larger, median sold price per square foot declined 0.8%, and the size bands moved in different directions. The result is a market-mix statistic—not a universal value adjustment.
That the $739,000 active median predicts lower future values
Active inventory was much smaller than the recent closed-sale group. Eighty percent of active-status listings were below 2,000 square feet, compared with 49.4% of latest-period closings. Asking prices remain seller expectations until the properties close.
That Del Webb Rancho Mirage has one fixed months-of-inventory number
Using all 20 active-status records produced 3.04 months at the trailing pace; excluding the two separately contingent-flagged records produced 2.73 months. Supply ranged from an estimated 9.0 months below 1,600 square feet to 0.8 month from 2,000 through 2,399 square feet. Every figure changes when one listing enters, goes contingent, closes, withdraws, or receives a status correction.
That a private pool carries one standard dollar premium
Private-pool-marked homes sold at higher medians even at nearly identical median living area, but the cohorts can also differ in lot size, orientation, view, landscaping, outdoor improvements, pool quality, solar, furnishings, and condition. The difference identifies a distinct comparison group; it does not establish an automatic appraisal adjustment.
That the MLS proves the community is completely sold out
The export contains no active builder-labeled record and no builder-labeled closing after September 2024. That supports a resale-market transition. Current direct builder, developer, or lot availability still requires separate verification.
That the MLS supplies a reliable concessions, financing, HOA, tax, or rule history
The concession field was populated on only 17 of 79 latest-period closings, and financing was blank on 59. Historical HOA fields can contain stale or erroneous values. Current dues, inclusions, transfer charges, Community Facilities District assessments, age-qualification rules, rental rules, and property-specific tax obligations belong in the separate home buying study guide and current transaction documents.
What the data mean for buyers and sellers
For buyers
The opportunity is segmented rather than universal.
Buyers seeking homes under 1,600 square feet had substantially more supply relative to the recent pace, and all seven active listings with at least 91 reported DOM had reduced. That combination can support careful comparison and negotiation. It does not remove the need to recognize an unusually strong pool, lot, view, or renovation.
Buyers targeting 2,000–2,399 square feet faced a tighter snapshot. Only two active-status listings occupied that tier against 30 closings in the preceding year. Waiting for a broad community discount could be less effective than identifying the right plan, monitoring new inventory, and being prepared when a well-positioned match appears.
The $840,000 median is not an offer price. The strongest comparison begins with the same plan or the closest functional substitute, then accounts for pool, orientation, lot, view, solar contract, garage, outdoor improvements, condition, furnishings, listing history, and competing inventory.
For sellers
The latest market rewarded supportable pricing. Successful homes sold faster, and reductions became smaller, but no closing exceeded final list price and only 15.2% met or exceeded it.
The active market also shows the cost of unresolved positioning. Forty-five percent of active-status listings had reduced, and every listing at 91 or more DOM had done so. An ambitious opening price can create a visible history that later negotiations must overcome.
The best launch strategy begins with same-plan and same-feature closings. A private pool, panoramic view, superior greenbelt position, paid solar, larger lot, or comprehensive improvement package may justify a stronger comparison set. It still needs evidence, and the highest active asking price remains an unconfirmed seller expectation.
The market in one sentence
Del Webb Rancho Mirage entered August 2026 with more completed sales, faster successful transactions, a higher median price driven partly by larger homes, and a current inventory structure that gave compact-home buyers more choice than buyers seeking the 2,000–2,399-square-foot range.
Frequently asked questions
What is the median home price in Del Webb Rancho Mirage?
The median was $840,000 across 79 MLS-reported closings from August 6, 2025 through August 5, 2026. Median recalculated sold price per square foot was $432.80, the median sold home measured 2,008 square feet, and median valid MLS-reported days on market was 39.5. The community median is the midpoint of the completed sales—not an estimate for every floor plan, pool, lot, view, or condition.
Are Del Webb Rancho Mirage home prices going up?
The latest rolling median increased 3.7% from the prior 12 months, but median sold price per square foot declined 0.8% while the median sold home became 9.6% larger. The 2026 year-to-date market also improved from 2025 but remained below the same-date 2024 median price and price per square foot. The evidence supports a rebound with a favorable larger-home mix—not uniform 3.7% appreciation across every property.
Is Del Webb Rancho Mirage currently a buyer’s market or seller’s market?
The August 11 snapshot equaled approximately 3.04 months of active-status inventory at the trailing sales pace, or 2.73 months after excluding two separately contingent-flagged records. That community-wide number suggests moderate supply, but the segments were very different: approximately 9.0 months below 1,600 square feet and 0.8 month from 2,000 through 2,399 square feet. The evidence supports a selective, plan-dependent market rather than one label for every home.
Where did buyers have the most negotiating room?
The greatest current supply relative to recent demand was below $700,000 and below 1,600 square feet. Seven active-status listings had at least 91 reported DOM, and all seven had reduced. Negotiating room still depends on the individual home’s plan, condition, pool, lot, view, solar terms, seller motivation, and competing inventory.
How much more is a private-pool home worth in Del Webb Rancho Mirage?
There is no defensible universal adjustment. In the latest 24 months, the explicit private-pool cohort had a $940,000 median sale and $472.75 median sold price per square foot, compared with $784,500 and $416.80 among records without an explicit marker. Median home size was almost identical, but lot size, view, landscaping, outdoor improvements, pool quality, condition, and other features were not controlled. Pool homes should be compared with other pool homes whenever enough recent matches exist.
Data methodology, sources, and update log
MLS dataset and calculation rules
This analysis uses a 428-record California Desert Association of REALTORS® MLS export for Del Webb Rancho Mirage containing 408 closed and 20 active-status listings across 120 fields. Closed sales span September 28, 2018 through August 5, 2026. The latest listing was entered August 10, 2026, and the latest MLS modification timestamp in the export was August 11, 2026 at 2:31:29 a.m.; the export does not identify the time zone.
- Primary comparison: 79 closings from August 6, 2025–August 5, 2026 versus 69 from August 6, 2024–August 5, 2025.
- Community-scope review: Every record matched Del Webb Rancho Mirage through subdivision, city, ZIP code, property type, and internal street-name checks. No off-community record was removed.
- Duplicate review: No duplicate listing number, exact duplicate row, or duplicate closing event was found.
- Price per square foot: Recalculated as closed price divided by valid reported living area. All 408 closed records contained the required values.
- Sale-to-list ratios: Recalculated from closed price and final list price rather than relying on rounded MLS ratio fields.
- Original-price cleaning: One apparent $95,000 original-list typo against a $950,000 final ask and sale was omitted from original-price and reduction calculations. The closing itself remained valid.
- Days on market: Nonnegative MLS DOM values only. One closing with −13 DOM was retained in price analysis but excluded from DOM calculations, leaving 78 valid observations in the latest rolling year.
- Private-pool method: Only explicit private-pool tokens in the structured Features field count as private-pool markers. A generic community-pool field was not treated as proof of a private residential pool.
- Model method: Structured builder-model name first; an unambiguous marketing-remarks name was used only when recorded square footage fell within that model’s structured MLS range.
- Builder method: New Construction marked yes, a structured New Construction property condition, or a listing agency name containing Pulte.
- Repeat-sale method: Normalized street number and street name were the primary property key, with chronology, square footage, bedrooms, bathrooms, and APN used for confidence checks. The publication-preferred strict cohort also required at least a 180-day hold, square footage within 2%, and unchanged recorded bedroom and bathroom counts.
- Inventory: Active-status count divided by the latest 12-month monthly closing pace. The ratio is not seasonally adjusted. Two active-status records carried a separate contingent flag and are disclosed separately.
- Feature cohorts: Descriptive groups that do not isolate the causal value of one feature. The not-flagged group can contain unknown or unreported features.
- Coverage limitations: Private, off-market, deed-only, certain builder, differently labeled, canceled, expired, withdrawn, and relisted transactions may be absent or incomplete.
All dollar figures are nominal and are not adjusted for inflation. MLS information is agent-entered, may be incomplete or inaccurate, and is deemed reliable but not guaranteed. Calculations are by Desert Oasis Insider and may differ from published MLS statistics because fields were independently audited and recalculated. Records and results can change as listings are added, corrected, or updated.
Community context sources
- City of Rancho Mirage CFD No. 4A official statement — 1,029-home mapped plan, detached age-qualified housing, development structure, and Community Facilities District context.
- PulteGroup’s 2018 grand-opening announcement — 55+ positioning, gated structure, detached homes, fee-simple land, ten original plans, original size range, and opening date.
- Del Webb at Rancho Mirage association management site — current official community naming.
- September 2024 Del Webb Rancho Mirage Roadrunner newsletter — association and builder-transition context.
- California Desert Association of REALTORS® MLS export supplied for this analysis.
Publication compliance: Confirm the current CDAR/MLS attribution and brokerage-display language required on the publication date.
Update log
August 11, 2026: Established equal rolling periods; audited community scope, duplicates, price fields, DOM, original prices, active and contingent flags, private-pool coding, feature cohorts, model names, builder labels, current inventory, annual history, and repeat sales.